The Waco Incident

As Treasury monument Robert Rudin tell: "[I]nvestigating events at Waco, without investigating the extreme activities of some militias, seems to bring up that legal philosophy en get outment agencies are the real threat to the safety of American citizens". In its defense, the commission stated that it was investigating Waco because the extensive and expanding popular concern about the federal government's actions against the Branch Davidians were negatively affect the public's trust in federal law enforcement. However, the interrogation was inclose from the first as an investigation into the use of excessive force by federal law enforcement rather than an attempt to come across what went wrong in Waco and how federal law enforcement could be ameliorate to prevent a repeat occurrence.

In keeping with the Committee's stated intent to check out the entire Waco incident, the investigative reach of the inquiry was broad. The Committee did not focus on the specific incidents that take to the death of four ATF agents and eighty-five Branch Davidians, namely, the ATF's bungled share of the contendrants and the FBI's decision to force the end of the siege. Rather, it chose to investigate every dialogue between every federal agency involved in the incident, from the initiation of the investigation into the Branch Davidians up to the end of the siege. The Committee demanded tho

If the Committee was seeking to investigate the true reason for the failure of the raid, it should have paid world-shaking attention to the ATF's operational ism. The Committee should have investigated the likelihood that the ATF's rough and military approach to the raid on the Branch Davidians has a basis in federal law enforcement's historical and oft-stated "war on drugs." Clearly, the ATF believed alleging the Davidians were involved in illegal drug manu positionuring would let them with increased support from other federal law enforcement agencies. The fact that it did provide them with increased military support demonstrates the federal government's no-tolerance military-style philosophy on drugs may not always be an discriminate philosophy.

Thus, on February 28, 1993, seventy-six ATF agents stormed the Davidian residence to serve the arrest and research warrants.

Yet, while Smerick was pushed aside, another FBI consultant during the raid raises the question of why federal authorities found a "cult near" more reliable than a credentialed religious expert? writhe Ross was listed as a "cult expert" and a self-described "deprogrammer" in the government's give notice (of) on Waco. Ross told the FBI he "would willingly aid law enforcement in an attempt to destroy a cult." Nancy Ammermann, professor of sociology at Emory University, claimed that Ross was "closely involved with both the ATF and FBI," supplying the ATF with the "name of an ex-member he believed would have important strategic information." Ross also said in a deposition that he "acted as a engagement between ATF and David Block," a Davidian who turned against the group when Ross "deprogrammed" him in 1992. fit in to the Treasury report, the ATF relied on Block's information to storm the Davidian complex or else of serving a warrant in the usual way. The report shows no evidence that any federal law enforcement policeman ever questioned whether Block was an objective or reliable witness.

Th
Ordercustompaper.com is a professional essay writing service at which you can buy essays on any topics and disciplines! All custom essays are written by professional writers!