Successful implementation of ERP Systems: issues and obstacles

Introduction Enterprise imagination Planning (ERP) outlines argon piece of landd (but customizable) softw ar applications, which manage entropy from diverse organizational activities and tender a fully merged solution to major organizational info centering problems. It integrates all data and processes of an organization into superstar single and centralized establishment. These systems comprise of m both circumstancess of hardware and software, in coordinate to achieve desegregation from motley de elementments in the organization. With the ontogeny of unsanded technologies its an essential part of their long-term competitive strategy. ERP software applications can be employd to manage product prep, purchase, inventory, interacting with suppliers, node relationship focal point service, and invest tracking.Discussion Enterprise imagery planning (ERP) packages touch many aspects of a communitys internal and external operations. Consequently, successful deplo yment and use of ERP systems are little to organizational performance and survival. This root word presents the results of a sphere of the problems and awaycomes in ERP, a lying-in which was conducted under the sponsorship of an ERP systems vendor. Enterprise systems (or green light resource planning systems ERP) get to been instrumental in advancing efficiency in organizations throughoutthe world.However, David Hebert of the Hackett radical stated, Only a select few companies wealthy person gotten value out of their ERP slayings, and those are world-class companies. Many companies are radically changing their data technology strategies to maintain a competitive advantage, become more antiphonal to change markets, and deliver better service at lower damage by purchasing off-the-shelf integrated ERP software instead of exploitation IT systems in-house. 123ERP System Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems are software packages that use relational database technology to integrate various units of an organizations information system. ERP systems provide several(prenominal) separate, but integrated modules, which can be installed as a package for any organization 4. Many large corporations use several opposite and separate information systems, often because they have merged with and/or acquired other companies with varied systems. An ERP system integrates these separate information systems and results in breakd data reliability and processing efficiency.ERP systems quickly became popular with large corporations that needed a seamless integration of their trade, but are now frequently apply by small to mid-sized companies. The excellent ability of ERP systems to simplify business accomplishment processing, eliminate work that adds little or no value, and simultaneously improve customer service are the main reasons for the outstanding success and popularity of these systems 5 ERP gravelEnterprise Resource Planning (ERP) systems are off-the-s helf software packages that clog up just somewhat of the key functions of an enterprisingness, such as logistics, sales, and financial guidance. These systems are generic, and the functionality they provide can serve a large variety of enterprises. ERP is a precise strategic tool to achieve business goals. However, ERP adoption is non evermore successful despite using substantial amount of meter and valet de chambre and material resources. To prevent ERP distresss, proper adoption processes and selection criteria should be considered to slander possible losses. To explain the ERP Fig Modelin an easily understandable format you have to know about the 4ps marketingmodel. Usually the 4Ps marketing model was a general marketing model where the 4Ps originally stood for people, product, promotion and price 6. all over the years, this model has been changed to become a business model and was modified by replacing promotion and price with process and performance 7. The modifie d 4P business model was created to architect the ERP Conceptual model because several people on the job(p) in management are familiar with the concept of the 4Ps.The ERP model is make of 4 comp iodinents that are implemented through a methodology. This figure demonstrates the integration between the comp championnts. Methodology encircles all four of the components to illustrate that from each one component is addressed and implemented in an integrated manner. 7 8ERP System effectuation With the development of new technologies many companies now consider technological improvements an essential part of their long-term competitive strategy, and consequently try to apply these technologies. Computer technology has brought about many benefits in helping the construction industry play increasingly complex challenges. It has achieved a wide range of successful applications at the plan level such as engineering design, view estimating, scheduling, planning and control, and integrated acoustic projection management.H. Klaus and G. Gable analyzed the concept of ERP, in battle array to explain its origin. They consider that the designation is not related to the role and characteristics of this system. The integrated system of type ERP is not foc apply on the resource management and it is not very developed within planning area, as its get a line may suggest it. It is rather focused on the integration of all organization departments, functions and processes within a single figurer informational system, capable of supporting(a) all these areas, with their individual and specific requirements. 8Design of Evaluation Model for ERP System ERP allows employees to appropriate information, query data, and run reports. This eliminates the need to store duplicate information in more than one place and reduces the amount of work necessary to make headway and analyze information9. ERP systems increase efficiency by freeing employees from perform era consuming, manual w ork. For example, legacy systems often require hours or long time to run reports. With ERP, reports can be produced in seconds. These efficiencies allow employees to spend time on other tasks reducing run expenses. Heres a proposed military rating design model for ERP system-The proposed ERP evaluation model 8Issues in Implementing ERP A Case Study Information technology/systems play a major role in improving the competitiveness of organizations. There are legion(predicate) enterprise information software packages accessible in the market. One of them is enterprise resource planning (ERP). ERP can provide signicant improvements in eciency across a company, but only when implemented correctly. Otherwise, an ERP system could be a curse and drag the whole enterprise into spiraling ineciency.Planning for ERP systems and their implementations requires an integrated approach to meet the requirements of various functional areas. With a brief overview of ERP implementations, this paper describes some experiences of an ERP implementation in a water corporation. The case study reveals some of the intricacies during the planning and implementation stages that may occur in any company in any part of the world. Suggestions are oered in resolving the issues of implementing ERP.The criteria for success (and failure) Whether a system is branded as a success or a failure is a appraisal, usually do at some point in time by one or more people with the benefit of hindsight. Most people, for example, consider that the new system at Heathrow airports Terminal 5 was a failure when it opened in 2008. Now, however, that same system (more accurately, system of systems) is operating successfully with few reported problems on a day-to-day basis.10 The judgment of whether a project has failed is not a simple yes/no decision. It is viridity for systems that initially did not live up to expectations to evolve over time to deliver useful services. However, management usually regard a project tends as a success if it meets three high-level criteriaIt should be delivered on time It should be delivered within budget It should deliver the expected functionalityIn summation to these should be added the considerations of the users, to make sure that the system fits in with their everyday working(a) It should be acceptable to the users (and hence used).If a project fails to satisfy one or more of these criteria when it is deployed, it is likely to be labeled a failure. If we almost examine the causes of system failures, we see that most of them are not due to failures of the technology. Instead, they are failures of the socio-technical system, often arising because the affable and organizational aspects either have not been appropriately considered, or have been separated from the technological aspects.It is important that the social and technical aspects of the overall system are developed in parallel, because they are often interdependent. If they are developed separately, any mismatches may not be detected until late in the project when they are invariably pricy and time-consuming to correct, and can even lead to the project being abandoned.The most important problems of ERP system implementation There are several studies relations with difficulties in enterprise system implementation. The researchers use different concepts, which have various scopes and meanings. As a result, comparing and integrating their findings is difficult. The number of recognized categories of problems and issues see by companies adopting ERP system varies from two through three to five. The identified groups make out issues of various nature and scope, e.g., technical, operational, legal, business/economic, organizational, managerial etc. The respondents opinions regarding the problems observed in ERP system, divided into the described categories, are presented in Table 1. Within each category, various difficulties are listed together with a short descriptio n. 11Table Problems occurring during ERP system implementation 11 ProblemDetailsOrganizational problems Project goalsLack of clearly specify goals of the implementation project incorrectly defined goals inadequacy of prioritiesCompanys conditionPoor company organization unreadable organizational procedures unclear strategyCommunication Problems with communication and information flow different understanding of the same ideas by different departmentsDecision makingProblems with decision making (e.g., regarding personnel) indecisiveness of company representativesPersonnel availabilityKey employees unavailable workers need of timeConflicts Conflicts between a companys departments conflicts during organizational changeImplementationMistakes in project management lack of risk management lack of implementation tasks coordinationmanagementOrganizational and self-possession changes during the project changes in requirementsChanges in a companychanges in company organizational structure imposed by the introduced systemTrainingInadequate training phase of a project cutting trainingSocial problems Employees knowledge and educationLack of management competence lack of personnel computer literacy lack of knowledge about company operations, enterprise systems and their implementation pass away managementLack of decease management support and involvement lack of project understanding by top managementImplementation aggroupLack of implementation team members commitment inadequate composition of implementation team (e.g., too few people, people not empowered to make decisions)MotivationLack of employees motive to perform implementation tasks and learn new skillsResistance to new systemResistance of middle management, IT staff, and system users people avoiding implementation dutiesResistance to changePeople highly accustomed to existing solutions and unwilling to changeProject managerLack of a project manager inadequate person appointed as a project manager necessity of sharing time between implementation tasks and organizational dutiesSystem providers competenceConsultants lacking competence, knowledge, and experience problems with the availability of system providers servicesProject acceptancePeople not convinced about the project lack of general acceptance for the project problem with project acceptance by people not touch on in implementation dutiesPersonnels fearFear about possible consequences of implementation project loss of job, position, and statusUsers tariff Lack of responsibility and care among people entering data into the systemTechnical problems DataProblems with completing and organizing system data problems with transferring data from legacy systems to ERP systemSystem efficiencyUsers unable to enter data on-line problems with customer and provider order handlingSystem drawbacksImplementers unaware of programs errors and shortcomings lack of economic application testingEconomic problems High costsInadequate financial budget for the project loss of financial resources lack of financial flexibility and resource allocationThe problems notice in Table 1 refer to practically all stakeholders involved in the project employees, implementation team members (who are functional departments managers in enterprise X), and top management representatives. Next, the organizations suffered from the high costs involved and problems attached with goals definition.Conclusion There is no silver bullet that can be used to kill off the potential for failure of ERP system development projects. The counterbalance of failures remains stubbornly high, even though several of the factors that are associated with failures bet to be known. A quick look at several of theTop 10 style lists of factors associated with failures (and successes) reveals that no two lists are identical, although there are several factors that recur on many lists.The lack of agreement suggests that the analyses of the reasons for failure may be overgeneral ising, by treating all failures as being more or less the same, whereas there are really different types of failure that arise through different combinations of factors.Reference1. Markus. L. learning from adopters experiences with ERP problems encountered & success achieved, online daybook , available at- http//www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source= clear&cd=1&ved=0CEUQFjAA&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.farrell-associates.com.au%2FBPI%2FPapers%2FERP%2520Research.pdf&ei=fWEdUPOyGIWIrAez_oGwAg&usg=AFQjCNFh8bwBuLBbiHMbCVvoLWoej1TJOQ&sig2=Oe695TrVDvjagLr3jWUNbA , accessed on 26th July 2012. 2. Marnewick. C. and Labuschagne. L. (2005),A conceptual model for enterprise resource planning (ERP),Information Management & Computer Security, Vol. 13 Iss 2 pp. 144 one hundred fifty-five, available at- http//dx.doi.org/10.1108/09685220510589325 , accessed on 1st aug 2012 .3. Hooks, A. (2002), Change management how to reduce the risk of change, available at www.internext-group.com4. Bae. B. 200 4. Implemantation of ERP Systems Journal.5. Gibbs, Jeff. The power of enterprise computing. Internal Auditor . Feb. 1997.6. Alexandrou, M. (2002), Supply chain management (SCM) definition, available at www.marialexadrou.com/glossary/scm.sp7. Marnewick, C. and Labuschagne, L. (2005),A conceptual model for enterprise resource planning (ERP),Information Management & Computer Security, Vol. 13 Iss 2 pp. 144 1558. Bryson, K. amd William E. Sullivan, (2003),Designing effective incentive-oriented contracts for application service provider hosting of ERP systems, Business bear on Management Journal, Vol. 9 Iss 6 pp. 705 721. Available at- http//dx.doi.org/10.1108/14637150310506648. Accessed on- 25th july 2012.9. D.P. Goyal, Gurbinder Randhawa, (2007),Design of evaluation model for ERP systems an empirical study of Indian Industry, Journal of Advances in Management Research, Vol. 4 Iss 1 pp. 63 73 available at http//dx.doi.org/10.1108/972798108000125. Accessed on 28th july 2012 10. Kakou ris, A.P. and Polychronopoulos.G, (2005),Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) System An good Tool for Production Management, Management Research News, Vol. 28 Iss 6 pp. 66 78 11. Joseph R. Muscatello, Michael H. Small, Injazz J. Chen, (2003),Implementing enterprise resource planning(ERP) systems in small and midsize manufacturing firms, worldwide Journal of Operations & Production Management, Vol. 23 Iss 8 pp. 850 871