Life Transitions Essay

The mesosystem is the second organise within Bronfenbrenners genial ecological cast. Bowes & Hayes (1999) describe the mesosystem as the inter family relationships between the indivuduals in the microsystem. on that point is direct collaboration between the soul and their relationships between their microsystem, their behaviors, expectations and values may differ with different experiences (Bowes, Grace & Hayes 2012). Regarding my life transition, the relationships between central office and school within the microsystem became stressful, causing a negative impact on myself. Though when looking at figure 2, it is evident that after the stressors had ceased, a strong positive relationship occurred. This character highlights how a negative relationship between two aspects of the microsystem after part dramatically change and become a powerful mesosytem agents to the exclusive effecting their phylogenesis. Other indirect relationships that still effect the psyche are seen in the exosystem.Garbarino (1992) describes the exosystem as a setting in which the case-by-case is not directly involved with, exactly still has an effect on them through the meso or microsystem. In legal injury of my life transition, the relationship with my get down and his workplace from figure 1 does not affect me directly, though due(p) to this my relationship with my father lessened throughout my transition to University for his working hours increase causing us to spend less time together.The outer around relationships shown in figures 1 and 2 are known as the macrosystem. tally to Bowes, Grace & Hayes (2012) the macro system is the broad societal or cultural contexts, cultural beliefs systems and values that are passed through our micro and mesosystems. An shell of my in the flesh(predicate) transition is the g everywherenment fundings for rural students to study away from kinfolk which allowed my financial transition to be much smo separate. The last key structure to Bronfenbrenner social ecological model is known as the chronosystem. The chronosystem emphasizes the individuals changes or in any of the ecological contexts of development over time (Shaffer & Kipp 2006). An fount of my personal transition that was undertaken was the sudden death of my father. It not only changed myself as an individual, but willcontinue to affect my across my life span.Harms (2010) created another four-dimensional approach within Bronfenbrenners model which takes the individuals inner world into contemplation as well as their purlieu. Both Harms and Bronfenbrenners models display that though there are different dimensions of the models, they are both connected to from each one other in multiple ways. Gibsons theoretical framework is another example of a perspective in human development. Both Bronfenbrenner and Gibsons theories involved the concept of there being a strong relationship between the individual and their environment, both meet aspects that ar e focused in change over time Tudge, Gray, & Hogan (1997). Developmental niche is another example of a model based upon different dimentions. Harkness & Super, (1994) define a developmental niche as two processes that are unique to an individual. It is based upon three basic components, the tangible and social settings, culturally regulated customs and the psychology of the individual an example of a developmental niche would be the individual and their close friends as it was formed from mutual interests. In addition, the relationships between the structures of an individuals microsystem can also impact in a similar way.Furthermore when discussing individual development, the concepts of resilience and vulnerability must be seen as factors. In terms of my personal transition, I would haveoriginally been seen as vulnerable, though due to increasing protecting(prenominal) factors such as new relationships being formed from my microsystem level, I thusly would have been deemed resil ient as I was able to thrive and fit to the new change (Miller, Osbahr, Boyd, Thomalla, Bharwani, Ziervogel, & Nelson 2010).Life transitions occur in individuals lives due to a psychological or environmental change in a fussy time in their life. My personal transition that is being discussed was the move from heights and my home town, to moving to Bendigo and commence University studies. Bronfenbrenners ecological model was used to examine the changed faced in terms of Microsystems, Mesosystems, Exosystem and Macrosystems. There are many other contributing factors that influence an individual and their life changes,from other theories such as Harms model, as well as Gibsons, to the vulnerability or resilience of the individual. When winning all these aspects into my personal transition, it is clearly shown that my relationships, psychological state and environment have all ended as positive and thus becoming a positive transition.ReferencesBerry, J. O. (1995). Families and dein stitutionalization An application of Bronfenbrenners social bionomics model. Journal of counseling & Development,73(4), 379-383. Bowes, J, M., Hayes, A. (1999). Children, families and communities contexts and consequences. Melbourne Oxford University Press. Bowes, J., Grace, R,. & Hayes, A. (2012). The role of context in childrens development. Retrieved from http//0-www.lib.latrobe.edu.au.alpha2.latrobe.edu.au/ereserve/copyright2014/4140321.pdfBronfenbrenner, U. (1999). Environments in developmental perspective theoretical and operational models. Measuring environment across the life span appear methods and concepts, 3-28. Bronfenbrenner, U. (1997). Ecological models of human development. Readings on the development of children, 1993, 37-43. Garbarino, J. (1992). Children and families in the social environment (2nd ed.). New York Aldine de Gruyter. Harkness, S., & Super, C. M. (1994). The developmental niche A theoretical framework for analyzing the home plate production of heal th. Social science & medicine, 38(2), 217-226. Harms, L (2010) Understanding human development a multidimensional approach. Oxford University Press. Miller, F., Osbahr, H., Boyd, E., Thomalla, F., Bharwani, S., Ziervogel, G., & Nelson, D. (2010). Resilience and vulnerability complementary or inappropriate concepts?. Ecology & society, 15(3).Rosa, E. M., & Tudge, J. (2013). Urie bronfenbrenners theory of human development Its evolution from ecology to bioecology. Journal of Family Theory & Review, 5(4), 243-258. doihttp//dx.doi.org/10.1111/jftr.12022 Shaffer, D., & Kipp, K. (2006). Developmental psychology Childhood and adolescence. Cengage knowledge Swick, K. J., & Williams, R. D. (2006). Ananalysis of Bronfenbrenners bio-ecological perspective for early childhood educators Implications for working with families experiencing stress. other(a) Childhood Education Journal, 33(5), 371-378.Tudge, J., Gray, J., & Hogan, D. M. (1997). Ecological perspectives in human development A comp arison of Gibson and Bronfenbrenner. Comparisons in human development Understanding time and context, 72-105.