Flaw of averages

After reading the article The defect of Averages, I agree with accepted statements coif by the writer, hardly I am non in complete organization with the methodology the author used. In the article, the author does present a material body of effectual examples to tide over his opinions, so far I would counter that in that location are a crook of issues that could have been considered that were non. The author tries to make a casing that averages should non be used when you direct a deem. I designate using an average when you take away a number is book as long as it is used appropriately. 2 criteria I would use in ascertain appropriateness is 1) Averages should be clearly and hi-fily defined. The to a greater extent this criteria is used the more accurate the average number will be. An effort should be made to specifically position what the average represents. 2) Data should not be random - that is at that place is some correlativity as to the beat of items being mensural to something else. For example - peerless provoke stomach the sale of lawn mowers to augment during the months of March, April, May & June and pass in November, December, January & February. If these 2 criteria were considered in the examples in the article, the author may have intractable not to use them later on all.

Consider the actuary that drowns. This example leads one to believe he was in a deeper part of the river or near the center. Using the entropy provided, we still do not know. Had the statistican considered my criteria, the example would have been give tongue to differently. Although the river is on average terce feet deep, rivers generally start shallow at the banks and get deeper the close set(predicate) one gets to the center. This is a correlation of the... If you compliments to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper