Philistinism in England and America

Comments on Matthew Arnolds Philistinism in England and America In his essay, Philistinism in England and America, Matthew Arnold examines the ancient ideas of Plato in the context of a twentieth century, capitalist golf-club. As he agrees with almost each of what Plato had to say, he also admits that he is come out of the closetdated, and that some of his teachings batchnot be use to us, living in an industrial superpower such as the United States. Still, though, Arnold defends the ancient philosopher. Education as a driveway to mental and physical righteousness is always a wide idea, whether it is in modern America or Ancient Greece. I disagree with this, and it is here that I must contest the literature of Plato, as well as the essay by Arnold, for he is definitely a strong backer of the ancient ideals.

In Platos mind, the value of an breeding is to clear ones mind of impure thought, bring it to a higher lever than at the start, and attain a certain level of righteousness. This may have been a good idea 2300 years ago, and today, I see it as very limiting and impractical. In his time, only the well-off aristocrats went to school. Its purpose was not for the students to hire skills or ideas that would help them later in life, except to flourish their minds, thus making them into better large number. There was no motif for them to learn any job skills. Back then, if you came from a rich family, you were rich. Working at simple jobs was for the peasants and slaves. Today, life is different. Our society is altogether unlike that of the ancient Greeks. We have no caste trunk limiting the riches and prominence of any citizen, we have no slavery to handle all the manual labor, our army is pro rata smaller and much less honored, and religion is a break away of ones private life, not a despotic public force as it was to the Ancient Greeks. Most people today have a regular, day to day job, whether it be in an office, store, factory, or anywhere else. We have to earn our wealth by working, not inheritance. That is why most people go to school today.

I am attending NYU so that I can get a job later in life. I study chemistry and engineering, in the hopes that I can become a chemical engineer. According to Plato, this is wrong, and Im corrupting my mind. At this point in my life, I should be reading history and literature, enhancing my mind, and not worrying about maturation a skill. To me, that is an unrealistic goal.



As I get older, I motive to have a job that pays well, so that I can support a family, and be free to do whatever I want in my spare time. I dont want to have to deal with restrictions in my life caused by a lack of money. If I lived and was educated in the way that Plato suggests, my life would probably turn out differently from that, and that is why I dislike his ideas.

In the quarter century BC, when Plato was alive and writing, society was different. His writings on education relate to that time, when modern capitalism was over two gram years away. He had no idea what life would be like today, so it is ridiculous to base ones life on what he said so persistent ago. Arnold refuses to admit this. He does say that Platos ideas are outdated, but adds that the basis for his thoughts could still be applied today, for the betterment of society and the people that live in it. If thats the way he feels, Im fine with it, but for me, learning a skill that will make me some money when Im older is more important than purifying my mind.

If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper