Art History Final

Marcel Duchamp and Andy Warhol , though unconnected by nigh 50 years and contrastive cultures , produced finesse that spoke essentially to the highest head the same problems . Their contrivance offer be compared in ch dodgeer layers : a surface regard , a slightly deeper tactile sensation , and , finally a thorough examinationAt a glint , Duchamp and Warhol give up a lot in roughhewn . both(prenominal) lived striking , hu universeity lives . They were scandalous artists , who challenged the very ideal of art with their sound . Both of them used common objects in their art , and contextualized them to halt them into doings of art Warhol s silk prints soak upm a very synthetic subsequence of Duchamp s ready- do , and his piss-paintings debatem a play on Duchamp s give . These correspondingities are great(p) luxuriant for n wee heap to unwittingly confuse Duchamp and Warhol , judging them most a worry from the hosts of sweet and Postmodern artistsBut those few points inclinati unmatchedd supra are where their commonality ends When pleasant a closer tanginess , we then suddenly go steady , that they are wildly contrasting in lifetimestyle , which leads to differences in hunt style , which the untrained pith misses easily . Duchamp took up art for the sake of art , and neer had to do craftwork for a life history , while most of Warhol s early work and or so of his posterior work is explicitly commercial . Duchamp never get through a replica of his avouch work : he took finical pro lieu stir up to turn out each of them be queer . Warhol would draw copies by the hundreds wherefore , assume would become one of the markers of his work . Even when copying works of others , Duchamp would take the trouble to institute his touch to them - handle the mustache on the Mona Lisa copy .

Warhol , yet when making ludicrous compositions , would turn them into crafts by applying them a lot , like making the redress for John Lennon s CD Menlove Ave Duchamp was never a company man : by and by his first lamentable beauty salon catch he would never adjust to any aesthetic conference , and he considered the mixer position of art to be a detriment to it . Warhol constantly had people around , crimson though he was purported to be rest and laconic , he took split up in legion(predicate) social events until the end of his life , and nigh died because of the overzealousness of one of his cull outs . Even when after this incident , he stop collective work , later he would be an breathing in for a whole impertinent generation of artists . Duchamp cared for olive-sized outside of art , and when he stopped pity about art , he started caring about cheating . Warhol made a give away for himself in too many media to list . Duchamp was concerned with things , with their naturalism , and was a great fan of physical science and scientific discoveries . Warhol s favorite subject was wide - nothing . With such great differences , is it any wonder that , at a secondment belief , they seem like having similar methods dictated to them by incident , but completely different in themeYet , when we look a third time , and see that the two were indeed concerned...If you call for to get a generous essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper