The author did not sufficiently support the premise of disbelief in faith and or religion. He states that if one does not believe in a religion then one can gain zipper from religious debates. This seems like a fallacy of division. It is not portentous and white. Someone might be ill-informed or not well-read enough about the belief of a religion. One could be inquiring for answers and find them from information used in a religious debate.
Putting the idea of faith into only 2 ways of thinking seems wrong since there are really three ways of thinking, Agnostic, Atheist and a truster. I think the author also used the fallacy of amphiboly in his explanation of a believer of one creed universe intolerant of other creeds. Amphiboly was also used in the rational choice of religion over secular choices. These fallacies antagonise the argument with poor grammatical structure and a comprehend of narrow-mindedness.
The essay could be mendd upon by adding a third gear belief of a searcher. One who is yet to believe, but is searching for a belief. That way you would have a staunch believer, an skeptic and one who is undecided on either. Another way to improve the argument is to change the sentence about a believer being intolerant of other...If you want to get a just essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment