Debate

RUNNING HEAD[Name][University]In Partial Support of the Statement that `Corporations will be less(prenominal) likely to act in socially prudent ways if on that point is either too much or too little disputationThe answer to this issue requires qualification . I agree with the John L . Campbell s tale that corporations are less likely to act in socially obligated port if there is too little contention . In monopolistic enterprises where corporations do not induct any competitor there is indeed no reason for companies to engage in socially liable behavior . The same applies in the case of Wal-Mart which close to does not have any competition in the athletic field of retail industry The company knows that its customers do not have any choice besides to go to them since it is the leading retailer of virtually every cheap product an average family inescapably for its consumption . Suppliers who want to sell their products to their consumers are soldieryd to centralise the smell of their products just so the same could be change through Wal-Mart at a cheap price . Employees who do not have opportunity for a dampen avocation have no choice but to accept the commencement salaries being offered by Wal-Mart . In the case of Wal-Mart , survival , fair name and reputation is immaterial since it knows that the consumers , suppliers and the employees have no better alternativesOn the other hand , I partially disagree with the statement that if there is too much competition corporations are withal less likely to act in socially responsible way . It is true that in whatever ways profound competition whitethorn be risky for the man in the sense that companies that may compromise the quality of their products and cheat their customers to be able to keep up with its competitors . Not all competition however , is bad . According to Frederick N .

Gordon , in some ways intense competition could be good because it may drive away those businesses which initially held positions of privilege and authority but does not have the talent , skill and social tariff to compete (p . 3 ) In fact , intense competition may even help in displacing those corporations that compromise the quality of their products , cheat the customers and abuse their employeesJohn L . Campbell s statement that there is no universal objective standard of what constitutes a socially responsible corporate behavior is very accurate . On ane hand , intense competition may be bad because it may lead to rivalry between the competitors and may force them to resort to tactics that may be prejudicial to the earthly concern and the society On the other hand , it may be better for the society because the society will eventually unwrap out which product is more superior and which company deserves to be trustedMy opinion however is that intense competition in the farsighted run may be more beneficial because the public has the opportunity to choose which among the products available has superior quality . versatile employees may eventually be recruited by other corporations . Corporations moldiness therefore continue to...If you want to get a wide essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper