Assess Kant`s Ethics Of Duty And Freedom As A Response To All Previous Ethical Theories.

Assess Kant`s ethics of duty and independence as a responseto all previous honorable theoriesKant , developing his ethical theory recited that the Intrinsic Char lay outer of Act is the foundation for determination of what is right and what is wrong . Kant is called deontologist by some researchers , save he in a representation opposed deontological burn up and consequentialism , as it underlined that moral quality if defined by the essential char prompter of it . The supporters of deontological moral concluded that moral value of act is not absolutely determined by the consequences of this act , just now that moral value of an act is determined by intrinsic nature . While Kant takes the very sound view that consequences atomic number 18 utterly irrelevant other deontological approaches are compatible with the pick out that consequences sometimes determine the moral worth of an act (Henry 1990 . Kant didn t couple with utilitarian moral theories , as they considered the results of the action to be the tail for evaluation of goodness , he to evaluate the will and motivating for the action and not its consequencesIn his theory Kant connects the concept of freedom with the let on idea of morality , i .e . he states that if an individual limits his acts because they would be immoral , this is the brightest presentation of the freedom concept . Freedom here intend absence of outside influence for example strong desire to get something or struggling for popularity and so on deprive humans of their freedom , they locomote enslaved according to Kant This state Kant defined as heteronomy . If a person is free than he acts according to moral lawfulnesss , and his behavior is not determined by outside forces , but by his nature . The state of freedom Kant calls autonomy - in other words - giving the law to oneself Autonomy of the will is the property that the will has of being a law to itself (independently of any property of the objects of volition (Henry , 1990 .

So , if someone wants to be free or autonomous he is not allowed to fall under the influence of external factors , but act guided by his own rational thinkingAn clamant itself means a statement telling what should be done . The rest of the categorical imperative is that it is not based on populate . This means that experience can provide only alleged(a) imperative and not how people should act . The Categorical insistent of Kant is not guided by experience , it antedates the experience . Those plant that have no sense as universal laws equivalent stealing for example help to formulate the categorical imperative - don t steal and so on . Thus Kant came to the oddment that experience of people is ed and shaped by their idea . Kant formulated the categorical imperative in the following way : 1 . Act only on that maxim done which you can at the same time will that it should become a universal law 2 . Act in such a way that you always treat globe , including yourself and others , as an end in itself , and never...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper