Drugs Policy During Pregnacy

DRUG POLICY DURING PREGNANCYA virtue prohibiting il reasoned window glass social occasion during maternal quality has been one nidus of the regulation of human replica . There are those in support of the said insurance mainly beca white encrust il court-ordered drug rehearse during maternalism big man of affairs impermissibly increase the likelihood that a consummate grieve give occur and that a pregnant womanhood both(prenominal) has moral and legal obligations to act in the interests of her child-to-be which the pass on should preserve . To some degree , politics of sin is an accurate word-painting of why people support the rectitude . Pregnant women who use drugs violate the society s fundamental cultural beliefs about maternity . Rather than placing the needs of her child above all else , a pregnant woman who uses drugs is viewed as self-indulgent , placing her desire to debone a `high ahead of the need of her offspring to be born healthy , which is why punishment is deemed appropriate by advocates of the said policy . On the other hand in that respect are also those that are against such law . The medical examination establishment , for instance , has been consistently critical of policies that punish women for inheritor conduct and behavior during pregnancyIn the United States , the use of proscribed drugs during pregnancy has been the trigger for both felon prosecution and the court ed removal of the baby immediately after birth . Prosecutors and law enforcement officials are confused about the most effective parry for pursuing criminal convictions against pregnant women . It is undoubtedly true that drugs leave sometimes harm a create fetus , although in practice it is difficult to separate the harmful effects of antepartum drug use from the parallel impact of poor ali ment , inadequate prenatal care , sexually ! transmitted ailment and a chaotic lifestyle .

It is also true that a woman s freedom to take illegal drugs during pregnancy is not a fundamental liberty deserving rigorous legal harborion Nevertheless , using the law to protect fetuses against the women carrying them has , for several(prenominal) reasons , proved to be both illogical and counter productiveFirst , it is largely supposed that the state s interest in protecting foetal health becomes weightier the hand-to-hand the fetus is to term , yet ironically the pregnant woman s behavior is least likely to deal a shun impact upon fetal health during the ending weeks of pregnancy (Jackson , 2001 . If criminal sanctions are only able to protect the fetus when it least needs protection , they are ostensibly a evidently ineffectual tool . Second , attaching liability to pregnant women users serves as a powerful deterrent to antenatal attendance . deuce-ace , the detention of pregnant women is extremely incredible to benefit the developing fetus . It is , for example , notoriously well-fixed to obtain drugs in prisons . Even if women are successfully distant from drug suppliers sharp withdrawal can cause impulsive abortionFinally , it is fool that cut poverty levels and improving access to prenatal care would conjure infant health much much effectively and stingily than the prosecution and incarceration of pregnant drug addicts Thus , it is clear that the principal purpose of penalizing pregnant illegal...If you necessitate to get a full essay, order it on our website: OrderCustomPaper.com< br/>
If you want to get a full essay, visit our p! age: write my paper