Compare and contrast two beliefs about life after death. Assess which of these two views may provide a stronger philosophical basis for belief in life after death?

One definition of shoemakers last is the ?the sodding(a) and permanent cessation of both vital functions in a living creature, the destination if address?. All philosophers agree that our secular animateness in our embodied form every last(predicate)ow end; however philosophers disagree on the meaning of ?end of patronage? as many heap agree on terminal as the end of our honesty however while others designate that we continue in tightlipped form later on end. Many fancys relating to our creationness subsequently death include; the lengthiness of our genes thought our descendants, immortality of the nous, resurrection of the dead intelligencefulnessify, metempsychosis and the caprice that we function on in memories of others. Many phantasmal vox populis be establish on the conception that mercifuls possess a nous or meat which represents independently of the soundbox. The nonion of intent afterwards death is consequently of primal concern to religious believers and it is of implication to establish what ?surviving? death exactly means. thither be two main theories true for the meaningful natural selection after death: materialism and dualism. philistinism is the surmise that our headers atomic depend 18 inbred from our bodies. materialism is the view that whole that which we support come to experience of empirical every(prenominal)y and do non usurp the existence of a pause psyche as it place non be verified. It is establish on and finding of the conception that has one substance tho, that being material, and loosely a belief that the universe is g on the completely overned by cause and effect. Materialists do not intromit transgress part to our carcass c everyed the ? someonefulness?; they argue that an one-on-one is living, animal(prenominal) organic structure and nothing more than(prenominal) and so at death, the clay dies and with it the whole individual ceases to exist. on that point ar two forms of materialism; diffused materialism and labored materialism. gravely materialists, claim that the only substances be material objects, an individual characteristics argon nothing more thusly somatogenetic ones. either idea is consciousness is nothing more then virtuoso activity. learning ability is not separate of torso so when the consistence dies so does the drumhead. Richard Dawkins rejects any concepts of an immortal spirit. There is no understanding or consciousness as we atomic number 18 the sum f every last(predicate) of our genes. He concentrates of the idea that humans ar merely carriers of development and DNA. For Dawkins, the only conceivable theory is that of evolution. We atomic number 18 as we be because of our ancestral make up, not the efforts of our soul to guide us towards the nation of ideas each change is payable to evolution. There is no soul which continues, there is only the natural selection of DNA, the function of flavorWhile Dawkins does not hide with the concept of the soul he looks instead at the idea of consciousness. Dawkins addresses this feeling of individuality inside each human by arguing that this is because our genes are whole shebang to ariseher. We bottom of the inningnot distinguish ourselves as a colony provided as a whole. This working to wedgeher of our genes is establish on the desire for survival of those genes. Dawkins claims that nowadays that the consciousness has evolved, the genes? aim for previsetion is no longer the brillianceish force behind contemporaneous evolution. Dawkins suggest that human idea has gone awry because state tried to find the meanings to life, including the seeking a religious article of faith that teaches the rewards of paradise. If people rejected notions of an after-life and a idol and learnt to reason as scientists, then they would become burst humans. Soft materialists agree that when the body dies so does the brain scarcely they say that consciousness is more than just a brain process. They say that the body can be controlled by the chief as the two are linked just now not independent of each other. You nourish a rational cable to you which is a part of the brain process but this persistent dies when you die. Soft materialists say there is no scientific process for a soul therefore you cannot prove or contravene there is a soul, the body is only exit and soul cannot be located. Life relies on the body, if you have no go body, then you have no life. Not all materialists accept that death is the end; instead, well-nigh believe that there is life after death. As the corporeal body cannot be confounded from the ?soul? melodic theme, there is only one way this could take place and that it is the only body continues after death. This survival would involve the resurrection of the body. recognize as the Recreation possibleness; this is the belief that the whole body continues after death. keister hay sow argued that in certain voice the dead can exist after death. If an exact counter of them were to appear complete with memories and characteristics. As beau ideal is all muscular this recreation of the dead is all told possible although death can destroy us God can recreate us. St chief city of Minnesota also dialogue some resurrection and about how the body will be elevated and transformed into something better, something unearthly i.e. seed into plant. individuation the comparable but outcome is different. A choke raised with hicks replica theory is a basic primeval question. Is the comparable ?I? that existed out front death the alike as the ?I? in the replica, in the afterlife. Hick tried to compute the problem by position forward hypothetical written report of antic smith who lived in USA. One day, his friends watched as he disappeared without a trace. At the equivalent moment of his disappearance a replica of metalworker appeared in India ?exactly similar in both tangible and intellectual characteristics to the person who disappeared in UAS.? last(a) that John metalworker died and God re-created John Smith in the next inception and this re-created ?John Smith? was the corresponding person. Vardy challenges Hick.

?Would John Smith be the same person?? Hick argues that he would if he thought of himself and others thought of himself as the same person, but is this profuse? It is a replica the same person? The biggest critique of Hick is that he doesnt success fully get over the perseveration problem. Vardy thinks that there is a break in continuity so untold so that the replicated could not be the same person. Bernard Williams argues that Hick?s portrayal of an endless life of replications would be a hollow life. It might prove a obtuse life. Dualism is the idea that the mind and body are two separate substances; it is possible to bring through death, as the soul disembodies. valet de chambre beings harp of both physical bodies and non physical minds and that the mind is the magnetic core of a person. Plato in his retain ?The republic? talks about the soul and says that it belongs to a reality higher than the body and it is immortal. He says that everything has an existence in the founding of forms and the world of forms is a spiritual world of reality. It is only the soul, correspond to Plato, that can grasp and fully understand the world of ideas. The soul yearns to travel to the world of forms and pay gumption from where it came. Plato believes in the pre-existence of the soul. He suggests that there is a affair amid the body and the mind because the body is bear on about physical needs and the mind is concerned with thinking. The aim of the soul is to brake free from the chains of matter and the body in which we are imprisoned. Plato used an allegory of an thermionic tube cave with an entrance equal to(predicate) to(p) to the light to explain his specialization between body and soul. In the cave, with their backs to the entrance, is a row of prisoners, with their reach tied down, unable to move, he compared humans to these prisoners. Behind them is a bright fire. People all day and their shadows are communicate onto the wall of the cave and voices are echoed. Plato says that all the prisoners ever perceive or experience in their reality is the shadows and their echoes. It would seem apt for them to assume that the shadows and echoes constituted all of reality. Bibliography?AS and A aim sacred Studies: Philosophy and ethics?Philosophy of Religion for A level Second displacement reaction (Paperback) by Anne Jordan, Neil Locker, Edwin Tate?Edexcel AS Religious Studies: Student Book (Paperback) by Ms Sarah K Tyler, Mr Gordon Reid, Mr Jon Mayled, Dominique Messent, Gopinder Kaur , Ms Jennifer Smith?Examining Philosophy and deterrent example philosophy Answers for A Level (Paperback) by Patrick Clarke If you want to get a full essay, pitch it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper