A major topic of conversation nowadays is whether or non voilence on television causes children to ba subscribe more violently. Shortly after I began to research this topic, I realized that it is not a unclutter cut issue. Evidence can be easily free-base to support each position. In the following essay I willing examine the different positions that can ba taken on this topic and try ro form my own outlook on the affect violent TV has on chidren.
        The prime(prenominal) position I will examine is the one in which it is call backd that, without a doubt, violent TV increases the likelyhood that a child will behave in a violent manner. This stands is examined in the Macleans clause intitled, advocate to the people. Televisions teen Rangers Kick up a storm. The author of this article, Particia Chrisholm, explains a heated debate over the affects that the kids show The Mighty Morphin proponent Rangers has on children. According to this article, the hemeted lycra covered Rangers acts as a uncollectible influence on children. Many parents have come to believe that the childen try to act like the kids hreos. A cocerned mother, Kathryn Flannery went so cold as to petition the CRTC. The CRTC responded by saying that the show is avassively to violent.(Chrisholm 1994 p.52) As a result of the petiton, many stations voluntarily refused to denudate the controversial kids show.
This case shows the power that people can have over the CRTC. Unfortunately, the parents were not able to entirely shield their children from the Power Rangers TV show. Many US broadcasters, available on cable, keep to air the show.
        Another study that supports this belief that TV emphasis causes children to act more violently is an experiment conducted by Leonard Eron and his collegues. In these studies, Leonard Eron...
If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.comIf you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment